SMC Discussion Areas
November 26, 2024, 10:05:32 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Restoring tools  (Read 8748 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
davet426
Guest
« on: December 03, 2006, 06:24:06 pm »

I think I have all the tools I need to get started. My question is for an air sander would you go orbital or disc? I believe orbital would give a better finish, but I'm just guessing...

One more - Does it matter if you have 1/4 vs 3/8 air line and fittings for painting and using air tools or is it just the cfm I need to worry about?

Thanks
Logged
loman4ec
Soda Jerks
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4768



« Reply #1 on: December 03, 2006, 07:23:13 pm »

I always use an orbital. They use a ton of air though. I actually went to Home Depot and bought a Black and Decker electric orbital that is 100% better than my air sander. How big is your aircompressor?
Logged
davet426
Guest
« Reply #2 on: December 03, 2006, 07:33:38 pm »

I was going to go with the Lowes 60 gallon Hobart. I think it say 12 to 14 scfm at whatever PSI. It seems to be enough to handle anything including the airless based on reading what everyone says about cfm. I am new to all of this so I am depending on a lot of reading...

I may just go with the electric orbital then, it's probably cheaper than the $85 I was going to spend on pneumatic... Although I don't think I've seen any of your painting skills yet! '<img'>  LOL!
Logged
loman4ec
Soda Jerks
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4768



« Reply #3 on: December 03, 2006, 07:48:42 pm »

The pric ewill be the same. The 60 gallon Hobart will run anything. You might as well go with an air sander. It will last longer. Check out some of my work in the photo album section. I have several pages there. I don't do as good as some people but for an amature I do pretty good. I really miss building machines. Just a few more years and I will be back to it.
Logged
davet426
Guest
« Reply #4 on: December 03, 2006, 08:05:16 pm »

Now I remember (after looking) you did that cool Frostie machine. I really like that! Thanks for the help. Any idea on 1/4 vs 3/8 for the hose and fittings?

Side topic - Whats up with not building machines? If you don't mind my asking...




Logged
Jim
Administrator
Soda Jerks
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5880


#1 Soda Jerk!


WWW
« Reply #5 on: December 03, 2006, 08:56:04 pm »

Dave,

In order to maintain a good CFM, you'll need the larger diameter hose. You can only squeeze so much air through a 1/4" hose...

Also, don't rule out a pnuematic board file for your tool box... These are great for getting things straight and flat!
Logged

My six cents,

Jim

davet426
Guest
« Reply #6 on: December 03, 2006, 08:58:30 pm »

Thanks Jim, although I'll have to figure out what a pneumatic board file is??? I guess I can sorta picture what it would be.
Logged
Jim
Administrator
Soda Jerks
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5880


#1 Soda Jerk!


WWW
« Reply #7 on: December 03, 2006, 09:12:03 pm »

Dave,

I have to say that most distributors refer to the tool as a "Straight Line Sander"...
Logged

My six cents,

Jim

davet426
Guest
« Reply #8 on: December 03, 2006, 09:36:21 pm »

Would that be more of a finishing tool? Or would it also take the place of the orbital for the rough stuff?
Logged
MoonDawg
Soda Jerks
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6227



« Reply #9 on: December 03, 2006, 10:26:34 pm »

This is a rough cut tool.  You will have low spots (dents) that you will fill with bondo. The length of this tool makes it easier to get a straight even finish.
Logged

Glen
Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.15 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!