Thanks Tkaz - I'm familiar with the Amazing Ribs website. I LOVE ribs, sadly nobody else in my family eats them (philistines!) so I do not often make them. They are too labor intensive for just me to eat.
I have a Thermapen instant read thermometer. One of the best kitchen investments ever, takes a lot of the guesswork out of doneness. I've never been a big fan of tactile measuring of doneness of food.
I certainly don't disagree with the science they present in the article, but I think the article and their conclusions are frankly a bit muddled.
They "debunk" beer can chicken, but also state that vertical roasting is a good method to use. So really they are only debunking the act of using liquid inside the vertical roasting stand. I have to say I have always questioned how steam from the beer can is supposed to keep the meat on the outer portion of the chicken moist, but a half a cup of beer is a small price to pay.
I agree that vertical roasting is probably not as good as spatchcocking, but that is simple physics. You change the amount of surface area exposed to the direct heat in spatchcocking. I also do not disagree that cooking individual pieces is the best method of all, but both methods lack some of the presentation you get from a whole roasted bird. We eat first with our eyes.
Besides - the roasting chicken looks funnier with a beer can shoved up its arse.
Jim