I was the 3rd person on here to respond to the initial post saying the 2nd response (to the initial post) made me laugh big time. As I see it, the person (i.e. who I will call the "complainer" going forward) who wasn't happy with the nature of the post threatened Pat to remove it, or else. Pat didn't remove it, as he felt was right, and the funny comments were all in good fun. I think Pat acted professionally by not posting this person's name, but rather the context of the message in it's original form (including the threats to Pat).
What really bothers me is why didn't this complainer didn't have the guts to respond to Pat's response on SMC and to clarify his point (i.e. stand up for what he believes in?). Instead this complainer chose to threaten Pat via email, and not respond in a public forum on SMC defending his position. It's one thing to disagree with a person, but it's another thing to threaten them. This complainer chose to direct his insults to Pat's email after he didn't get his way on SMC. I've seen instances on SMC where a person said something to someone else, but when called out on it, chimed back in on SMC to clarify his/her point. This complainer stirred the pot, then hid choosing to email Pat instead.
I briefly spoke with Pat today and he hasn't been on the site today and won't be going on it anytime soon (his words). I told him of the outpouring of support he has here, and how we all want him back. Pat appreciated hearing that, but he is tired of the BS and the threats. I'm sure I'll start getting threats now on my email from the complainer (after posting this), but I don't have a website or a business he can trash, and I don't hide from my email (BTW...It's
bobcarlson123@gmail.com in case you feel like threatening someone else other than Pat).
Lighten up you crybaby! And grow up while you're at it.